typical vs atypical disfluencies asha

Consistent with treatment approaches for children and adolescents, treatment for adults needs to be individualized, dynamic, and multidimensional. (2011). Counseling is an integral part of the assessment and treatment of individuals who stutter or clutter. SLPs also need to discuss with persons who stutter and their families how to evaluate the veracity and trustworthiness of sites claiming to cure stuttering that they may find on their own. This may progress to the client analyzing the clinicians or their own pseudostuttering, to analyzing a video of their own stuttering to real-time analysis (Bray & Kehle, 2001; Bray et al., 2003; Cream et al., 2010; Harasym et al., 2015; Prins & Ingham, 2009). They may hesitate when speaking, use fillers ("like" or "uh"), or repeat a word or phrase. Crystal ball gazing: Research and clinical work in fluency disorders in 2026. Traits of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in school-age children who stutter. ), Cluttering: A handbook of research, intervention and education (pp. Persons who stutter may appear to have expressive language problems because of a tendency to avoid speaking or speak in a way thats unclear to the listener. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139108683.023. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 69, 180189. Education, 136(2), 159168. There are two predominant types of atypical disfluencies: stuttering and cluttering. In D. Ward & K. Scaler Scott (Eds. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 37(4), 289299. Some children go through a disfluent period of speaking. modifying instructions to accommodate the home language, using exemplars in audio or video format in the home language, and. Sheehan, J. G. (1970). https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-730X(88)90004-6, Onslow, M., & OBrian, S. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23487, Dignazio, L. E., Kenny, M. M., Raj, E. X., & Pelkey, K. D. (2020). A comprehensive treatment approach for school-age children, adolescents, and adults includes multiple goals and considers the age of the individual and their unique needs (e.g., communication in the classroom, in the community, or at work). 155192). Scope of practice in speech-language pathology [Scope of practice]. Erickson, S., & Block, S. (2013). Therefore, clinicians may want to ask open-ended questions to assess communication across specific situations (e.g., How do you participate in class? How do you talk to strangers? Please describe a situation when you ordered food from a restaurant. How did it feel?). Journal of Fluency Disorders, 32(2), 95120. Differentiating typical disfluencies and stuttering is a critical piece of assessment, particularly for preschool children. The clinical process for an adult involves. May 11, 2022 As a speech-language pathologist, you might often face the question of whether a young child is showing early signs of stuttering, or if those disruptions are simply typical speech disfluencies. Ward, D., & Scaler Scott, K. (2011). Journal of Fluency Disorders, 26(3), 179206. Treatment approaches are individualized based on the childs needs and family communication patterns. Erlbaum. Individuals typically arent diagnosed or do not start treatment until 8 years of age or into adolescence/adulthood (Ward & Scaler Scott, 2011). Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 19. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49(1), 113126. Reilly, S., Onslow, M., Packman, A., Cini, E., Conway, L., Ukoumunne, O., Bavin, E., Prior, M., Eadie, P., Block, S., & Wake, M. (2013). Course: #10096 Level: Intermediate 1 Hour 2233 Reviews. ), Current issues in stuttering research and practice (pp. PLOS ONE, 10(7), Article e0133758. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2002/005), Bothe, A. K. (2002). American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(3S), 12351243. Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504. Clinicians need to be familiar with various counseling principles and approaches (Luterman, 2006; Zebrowski & Schum, 1993). typical vs atypical disfluencies asha 24 Jun. Mancinelli, J. M. (2019). Thieme. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 11(2), 131149. Psychosocial support for adults who stutter: Exploring the role of online communities. Typical vs Atypical Pneumonia in Tabular Form 6. Al-Jazi, A. There may be a relationship between stuttering and working memory. Clinicians may start with the client observing videos of others who stutter (or a puppet for children) to help them identify patterns, attitudes, and beliefs about communication and stuttering. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-37384, Finn, P., & Cordes, A. K. (1997). Douglass, J. E., Constantino, C., Alvarado, J., Verrastro, K., & Smith, K. (2019). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(11), 30973109. In D. Ward & K. Scaler Scott (Eds. excessive coarticulation resulting in the collapsing and/or deletion of syllables and/or word endings; excessive disfluencies, which are usually of the more nonstuttering type (e.g., excessive revisions and/or use of filler words, such as um); pauses in places typically not expected syntactically; unusual prosody (often due to the atypical placement of pauses rather than a pedantic speaking style, as observed in many with autism spectrum disorder). Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Speech, Language and Hearing, 20(3), 144153. 4. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(5), 12211233. An effective clientclinician relationship facilitates the identification of potential roadblocks (Plexico et al., 2010). Cluttering can co-occur with other disorders, including. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2016.09.005, Gerlach, H., Hollister, J., Caggiano, L., & Zebrowski, P. M. (2019). Clients often report successful stuttering therapy as a transformational experience progressing from avoidance to acceptance and openness, increasing self-confidence and self-efficacy (Plexico et al., 2005; Tichenor & Yaruss, 2019a). Starkweather, C. W. (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2007.02.001. Children and adults who stutter also frequently experience psychological, emotional, social, and functional consequences from their stuttering, including social anxiety, a sense of loss of control, and negative thoughts or feelings about themselves or about communication (Boyle, 2015; Craig & Tran, 2014; Iverach et al., 2016; Iverach & Rapee, 2014). Psychology Press. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 27(4), 289304. Onset may be progressive or sudden. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 7(4), 6276. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2007/008), Oyono, L. T., Pascoe, M., & Singh, S. (2018). Alm, P. A. Enhancing treatment for school-age children who stutter: I. Remaining informed of research in the area of fluency disorders and advancing the knowledge base of the nature of the disability, screening, diagnosis, prognostic indicators, assessment, treatment, and service delivery for individuals with fluency disorders. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00052-2, Yaruss, J. S., & Quesal, R. W. (2006). The effects of self-disclosure and non-self-disclosure of stuttering on listeners perceptions of a person who stutters. Barnes, T. D., Wozniak, D. F., Gutierrez, J., Han, T. U., Drayna, D., & Holy, T. (2016). 1-888-266-0574. BMJ, 331(7518), 659661. Other identification strategies may include video or pseudostuttering analysis or tallying/freezing. A recent U.S. study estimated that approximately 2% of children ages 317 years stutter (Zablotsky et al., 2019). Children with normal disfluencies have emergent fluency. Characteristics of Typical Disfluency and Stuttering Differentiating typical disfluencies and stuttering is a critical piece of assessment, particularly for preschool children. In D. Ward & K. Scaler Scott (Eds. Estimates have reported the male-to-female ratio of individuals who stutter to be as large as 4:1; however, more recent studies in preschool children suggest that a younger age of onset has smaller ratios in gender differences (Yairi & Ambrose, 2013). Consistent with the World Health Organizations (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework (ASHA, 2016a; Coleman & Yaruss, 2014; Vanryckeghem & Kawai, 2015; WHO, 2001; Yaruss, 2007; Yaruss & Quesal, 2004, 2006), a comprehensive fluency assessment is conducted to identify and describe. When developing treatment goals, the clinician takes a holistic approach and considers the extent to which stuttering affects the individuals entire communication experience. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 36(2), 122129. typical vs atypical disfluencies asha typical vs atypical disfluencies asha. Drayna, D., & Kang, C. (2011). Other treatment approaches described below also may be incorporated as part of a comprehensive treatment approach. Available 8:30 a.m.5:00 p.m. Disclosure of stuttering and quality of life in people who stutter. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.10.003, Bray, M. A., & Kehle, T. J. Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. Support activities can be incorporated into group treatment and through participation in self-help groups (Trichon & Raj, 2018), attendance at self-help conferences (Boyle et al., 2018; Gerlach et al., 2019; Trichon & Tetnowski, 2011), and participation in summer camp programs (Byrd et al., 2016). Consider the individuals age, preferences, and needs within the context of family and community when selecting and adapting treatment approaches and materials. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 62, 105725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2019.105725, Plexico, L. W., Manning, W. H., & DiLollo, A. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 43, 116. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 61, 105713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2019.105713, Douglass, J. E., Schwab, M., & Alvarado, J. ET MondayFriday, Site Help | AZ Topic Index | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use Cluttering treatment: Theoretical considerations and intervention planning. Harper & Row. Some people who clutter tend to decrease volume at the ends of sentences or phrases and, therefore, can benefit from learning to keep a steady volume throughout their utterances. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 3(4), 374380. Stuttering impact: A shared perception for parents and children. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 21(34), 201214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-730X(01)00098-5. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(4), 367372. Children with a family history of stuttering were estimated to be 1.89 times more likely to persist in stuttering (Singer et al., 2020). Factors that contribute to the perception of overt stuttering severity include frequency, duration, effort, naturalness, and the ability of the person who stutters to communicate effectively and efficiently. Cluttering and Down syndrome. Many clinicians use an integration of approaches to achieve optimal outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2015.08.001, Han, T.-U., Park, J., Domingues, C. F., Moretti-Ferreira, D., Paris, E., Sainz, E., Gutierrez, J., & Drayna, D. (2014). Prins, D., & Ingham, R. J. In K. O. Lewis (Ed. Stuttering severity may vary dramatically by speaking situation. The SLP can instruct parents in how to modify the environment to enhance fluency and reduce communication pressure. Adolescents and young adults who stutter were found to have more white matter connections in the right hemisphere as compared with normally fluent controls (Watkins et al., 2008). Recovery rates were estimated to be approximately 88%91% by Yairi and Ambrose (2013). Seminars in Speech and Language, 28(4), 312322. (2018). Parent perceptions of an integrated stuttering treatment and behavioral self-regulation program for early developmental stuttering. Assessment of speech fluency (e.g., frequency, type, and duration of disfluencies), speech rate, speech intelligibility, and the presence of secondary behaviors in a variety of speaking tasks (e.g., conversational and narrative contexts). Individuals who stutter may report fear or anxiety about speaking and frustration or embarrassment with the time and effort required to speak (Ezrati-Vinacour et al., 2001). The ASHA Leader, 18(3), 1415. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(3S), 11391151. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 38(4), 342355. Molt, L. F. (1996). Clinicians can help clients progress to active stages through building self-efficacy. Most individuals who stutter demonstrate both observable disfluency and negative life impact (Beilby et al., 2012b; Ribbler, 2006; Tichenor & Yaruss, 2019a; Yaruss et al., 2012). Bargaining, 5. Prior to developing generalization activities, the SLP needs to consider the individuals profile. if monitoring or treatment (direct or indirect) is recommended. Parents of bilingual children easily can be trained to provide perceptual ratings of fluency in any language spoken by the child (Shenker, 2013). Scientific Reports, 7(1), 118. The clinical applications of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with clients who stutter. (2007) for a description of how the stages of change model can be applied to fluency therapy. Some individuals develop speech habits to escape or avoid moments of overt stuttering, such as changing words or using interjections (e.g., um, uh), and they may become so skilled at hiding stuttering that their speech appears to be fluent (covert stuttering; B. Murphy et al., 2007). (2018). Treatment for fluency disorders helps the individual make changes that will facilitate communication in a variety of settings. School-based SLPs and IEP teams should resist pressure to minimize the impact of stuttering on educational achievement for the purpose of disqualifying students from speech-language pathology services. ), Cluttering: A handbook of research, intervention and education (pp. SLPs can include teachers in the treatment process by educating them about fluency disorders, involving them in treatment sessions, and having them assist with assignments outside of treatment sessions. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2006.12.003. Tellis and Tellis (2003) caution clinicians not to confuse these word-finding problems with stuttering. Young children may or may not verbalize their reactions to stuttering. Impact of stuttering severity on adolescents domain-specific and general self-esteem through cognitive and emotional mediating processes. Psychology Press. 233253). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2016.07.002, Iverach, L., & Rapee, R. M. (2014). However, fluency shaping approaches, such as easy onset or continuous phonation, may not be appropriate for the treatment of cluttering. Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351122351, Klein, J. F., & Hood, S. B. information regarding family, personal, and cultural perception of fluency. Preliminary research suggests adults who clutter demonstrate differences in cortical and subcortical activity compared to controls (Ward et al., 2015). Engaging parents in treatment helps to achieve carryover in the home environment and helps with treatment across languages (Shenker, 2013). hurricane elizabeth 2015; cheap houses for sale in madison county; stifel wealth tracker login; zadna naprava peugeot 206; 3 days a week half marathon training plan; (2011). EBP Briefs, 2(4), 18. Please enable it in order to use the full functionality of our website. autism (see Scaler Scott, 2011, for a review), word-finding/language organization difficulties (Myers, 1992), and. bringing peers into the treatment setting; planning strategies to use in the classroom, cafeteria, or playground or at work; taking outings to stores and other businesses; and. the impact of communication impairments on, Relevant case history (as appropriate for age), including. https://doi.org/10.1044/cicsd_31_S_69, Blood, G. W., & Blood, I. M. (2016). ), Controversies about stuttering therapy (pp. ), More than fluency: The social, emotional, and cognitive dimensions of stuttering (pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2013.09.003, Ezrati-Vinacour, R., Platzky, R., & Yairi, E. (2001). Helping individuals who stutter become more accepting and open about their stuttering may help them have workplace conversations about it, advocate for themselves, and build support systems within the workplace (Plexico et al., 2019). (2001). https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0353, Guitar, B. Singular. With adults, initiation of treatment depends on the individuals previous positive or negative intervention experiences and current needs pertaining to their fluency and the impact of their fluency disorder on communication in day-to-day activities and participation in various settings (e.g., community or work). In B. J. Amster & E. R. Klein (Eds. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 34(3), 187200. Overall, the lifetime prevalence of stuttering was estimated to be 0.72% (Craig et al., 2002). Awareness and identification helps speakers better understand communication, speech, and stuttering along with their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. Prevalence of stuttering in African American preschool children. This perceived rapid rateand the resulting breakdown in speech clarityis thought to be because speakers with cluttering speak at a rate that is too fast for their systems to handle (Myers, 1992; St. Louis et al., 2007; Ward, 2006). However, these disfluencies are typical and not indicative of a disorder (Shenker, 2013). Epidemiology of stuttering in the community across the entire life span. wandering womb handmaid's tale; ismackzi gta 5 mods; katherine stinney age. Operant treatment (e.g., Palin ParentChild Interaction Therapy, Kelman & Nicholas, 2020; Lidcombe Program, Onslow et al., 2003) incorporates principles of operant conditioning and uses a response contingency to reinforce the child for fluent speech and redirect disfluent speech (the child is periodically asked for correction). Providing prevention information to individuals and groups known to be at risk for fluency disorders and to individuals working with those at risk. Skip to main content. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2015.1010583, Adriaensens, S., Beyers, W., & Struyf, E. (2015). American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20(3), 163179. The coexistence of disabling conditions in children who stutter: Evidence from the National Health Interview Survey. See ASHAs Practice Portal pages on Counseling For Professional Service Delivery and Cultural Responsiveness for more information related to counseling. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12(2), 243253. Clinicians need to be observant of indicators, such as stuttering avoidance or social isolation, that clients/patients/students may be internalizing negative stereotypes about stuttering (Boyle, 2013a). The prevalence rate of stuttering in African American children (25 years of age) was estimated to be 2.52%, but was not reported to not be significantly different from that reported for European American children in the same age group between 2- to 5-year-old African American children and European American children (Proctor et al., 2008). Clinicians do not have to choose one approach or the other. Disfluent behavior becomes more complex as fear of speaking, anxiety, and resulting avoidance increase. They may hesitate when speaking, use fillers (like or uh), or repeat a word or phrase. (2018). Signs and symptoms of stuttering include core speech behaviors, such as. Bakker, K., Myers, F. L., Raphael, L. J., & St. Louis, K. O. Treatment is sensitive to cultural and linguistic factors and addresses goals within WHOs ICF framework (ASHA, 2016a; Coleman & Yaruss, 2014; WHO, 2001; Yaruss, 2007; Yaruss & Quesal, 2004, 2006). For stuttering, the assessment will identify risk factors associated with stuttering, the severity of stuttering, and the presence of other speech and language concerns. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0304), Craig, A., Hancock, K., Tran, Y., Craig, M., & Peters, K. (2002). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-1648, Boscolo, B., Ratner, N. B., & Rescorla, L. (2002). Temperamental characteristics of young children who stutter. Maintenance of improved attitudes toward stuttering. Stuttering as defined by adults who stutter. School Psychology Review, 30(1), 135141. A meta-analysis did find differences in the receptive vocabulary, expressive vocabulary, and mean length of utterance between children who stutter and children who do not stutter, with children who stutter generally performing relatively weaker (Ntourou et al., 2011). Characteristics of Typical Disfluency and Stuttering Differentiating typical disfluencies and stuttering is a critical piece of assessment, particularly for preschool children. Screening of communication when a fluency disorder is suspected and as part of a comprehensive speech-language evaluation. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 46, 114. Genetic factors and therapy outcomes in persistent developmental stuttering. Examples of support groups and activities include FRIENDS: The National Association of Young People Who Stutter, the National Stuttering Association, and SAY: The Stuttering Association for the Young; online groups (e.g., online chats); and social media (e.g., blogs; Reeves, 2006). Environmental factors include family dynamics, fast-paced lifestyle, and stress and anxiety (J. D. Anderson et al., 2003). Journal of Fluency Disorders, 53, 2640. Self-help and mutual aid groups. Relationships among linguistic processing speed, phonological working memory, and attention in children who stutter. Stuttering Therapy Resources. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 36(1), 1726. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(12), 43564369. Wampold, B. E. (2001). Stuttering-related podcasts: Audio-based self-help for people who stutter. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00093, de Sonneville-Koedoot, C., Stolk, E., Rietveld, T., & Franken, M. C. (2015). Tourettes syndrome (see Van Borsel, 2011, for a review). Perspectives on Fluency and Fluency Disorders, 11(1), 711. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00138, Tichenor, S. E., & Yaruss, J. S. (2019b). Some adults lack communication confidence as a result of negative self-perceptions about their stuttering (Beilby et al., 2012a) or due to repeated exposure to people holding stereotypes about stuttering, which, in turn, may create self-stigmatization (Boyle, 2013a). Clinical decision making in fluency disorders. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0318, Lucey, J., Evans, D., & Maxfield, N. D. (2019). Healey, E. C., Reid, R., & Donaher, J. 256276). Cognitive behavior therapy and mindfulness training in the treatment of adults who stutter. the diagnosis of a fluency disorder (stuttering, cluttering, or both); a differential diagnosis between fluency disorders and reading disorders, language disorders, and/or speech sound disorders; descriptions of the characteristics and severity of the fluency disorder; judgments on the degree of impact the fluency disorder has on verbal communication and quality of life; a determination if the person will benefit from treatment; a determination of adverse educational, social, and vocational impact; parent or family counseling to determine optimal responses to the childs speech and stuttering; and. These should be considered during differential diagnosis but should not be the sole therapeutic strategies. Fluency shaping with young stutterers. 341358). In L. Cummings (Ed. There are benefits of both individual and group treatment. Timing refers to the initiation of treatment relative to the diagnosis. With this approach, parents are trained to provide verbal contingencies based on whether a childs speech is fluent or stuttered (M. Jones et al., 2005; Onslow et al., 2003). excessive levels of typical disfluencies (e.g., revisions, interjections), maze behaviors or frequent topic shifting (e.g., I need to go toI mean Im out of cheese. Measuring lexical diversity in children who stutter: Application of vocd. For a child with normal disfluencies, a "wait and see" approach is much more acceptable than for a child with early stuttering. The speakers measured speech rate is not always greater than average, but the listener perceives it as rapid. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(1), 6568. Sisskin, V. (2018). To foster generalization, assignments adhere to a hierarchy of linguistic skills and environmental stressors. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds. (2017). Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 43(4), 536548. Wiig, E. H., & Semel, E. M. (1984). As children who stutter get older, they may become adept at word and situational avoidances that result in a low frequency of overt stuttering. Not all of these approaches are appropriate for the treatment of cluttering (see Cluttering Treatment below). As is the case with any communication disorder, language differences and family/individual values and preferences are taken into consideration during assessment. Goals that focus on minimizing negative reactions to stuttering and difficulties communicating in various speaking situations may help the individual reduce the effort used to hide or avoid their disfluencies and communicate with more ease. The clutterer. Is parentchild interaction therapy effective in reducing stuttering? Some families may decide to send children to live with relatives or ask children not to speak in public (Shenker, 2013). In this way, positive reinforcement is used to increase or strengthen the response of fluency (the desired behavior). The underlying relationship between stuttering and working memory is not fully understood but may be related to interruptions in sensorimotor timing for developmental stuttering and may involve both the basal ganglia and the prefrontal cortex (Bowers et al., 2018). Depression & Anxiety, 27(7), 687692. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(6), 14651479. Stuttering modification strategies, originated by Van Riper (1973), have four stages: (1) identification, (2) desensitization, (3) modification, and (4) generalization and aim to reduce associated physical tension and struggle by helping individuals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(9), 24832505. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 13(5), 357373. Short-term intensive treatment programs have been used for some individuals to reduce disfluency and address negative attitudes. Approaches may vary by therapeutic philosophy, goals and activities, duration and intensity, and age of the individual. There is ongoing debate as to whether persons who stutter have language skills that are equivalent to those seen in well-matched comparison speakers. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(1), 13. gain insights from others who may be further along in treatment, have opportunities to gain self-confidence from mentoring others, and. Journal of Communication Disorders, 80, 1117. Arnold, H. S., Conture, E. G., Key, A. P., & Walden, T. (2011). (2014). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-0811, Zebrowski, P. M. (2002). (2011). University Park Press. Acceptance; Constantino et al., 2017. It is not appropriate to determine a standard score if the norming sample of the assessment is not representative of the individual being assessed.

Swanville, Mn Obituaries, Articles T

typical vs atypical disfluencies ashaПока нет комментариев

typical vs atypical disfluencies asha

typical vs atypical disfluencies asha

typical vs atypical disfluencies asha

typical vs atypical disfluencies ashafernandina beach florida obituaries

Апрель 2023
Пн Вт Ср Чт Пт Сб Вс
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

typical vs atypical disfluencies asha

typical vs atypical disfluencies asha

 south fork outfitters