editor decision started nature rejection

My code is GPL licensed, can I issue a license to have my code be distributed in a specific MIT licensed project. Answer: Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that it's a Nature journal, that's unlikely. Individuals often make decisions based on what they believe to be the historical purposes and goals of an institution. That's it . and if it is not clarified on the . [CDATA[// > In cases where authors opt in to publication of peer reviewer comments and reviewers opt in to being named, we will not link a reviewers name to their report unless they choose to sign their comments to the author with their name. I am at the same stage. 1) After submission, the system shows that Manuscript under consideration, which means that it is being evaluated by the editor; 2) If the latest status becomes Editor decision started, it means it has been sent for review (you can also check whether there is reviewer.zip in the file list, if yes, it means it is sent Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. Can airtags be tracked from an iMac desktop, with no iPhone? If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience and apparent conflicts of interest. Can we write a courteous mail asking about the status change from 'Decision Made' to 'Under Consideration'? I have experience with the manuscript submission process, from submission to peer review, to acceptance/rejection. What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? These are very political journals. If the journal lowers its threshold for publication, its reputation will decline, devaluing the achievements of thousands of previously accepted authors. youre still in the running. Research suggests that . I have also worked as a subject matter expert in the field of Biomedicine. I am faced with the same situation right now. The first stage for a newly submitted Article is that the editorial staff consider whether to send it for peer-review. 2022.5.11 Manuscript under submission/Manuscript received, 2022.5.12 Editor assigned/Manuscript under consideration, 6.2Manuscript under considerationNS, Decision sent to author, NZip for reviewers, 9All Reviewers Assigned109Manuscript under consideration, 2022.10.10 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision, , comments, #1, #2, #3IMEC&, 2022.11.23 Manuscript under submission/Manuscript received/Editor assigned/Manuscript under consideration (), 2022.11.25 Editor Decision Started (All Reviewer Assigned), 1212All Reviewer AssignedManuscript under consideration, 2022.12.13 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision, #1hhhh, #3comment. To avoid such conflicts of interest, Nature requires potential referees to disclose any professional and commercial competing interests before undertaking to review a paper, and requires referees not to copy papers or to circulate them to un-named colleagues. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. volume5,page 917 (2002)Cite this article. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? The "Decision Started" status implies that peer review for your manuscript has been completed and the journal . and JavaScript. Authors should note that as Nature is an interdisciplinary journal, referees for a paper are chosen for different reasons, for example a technical expert and a person who has a general overview of a field might both referee the same paper. More importantly, in the rejection letter it was evident that the Editor had taken the time to read through our manuscript and had given it some thought . Answer (1 of 4): Hi! My experiences with these journals have not been this positive. Papers are evaluated along multiple dimensions, including technical reliability, novelty and interest, but the final decision to accept or reject must collapse all this information into a single binary choice. This referees opinion must be satisfied for the manuscript to be published, but as this referee may not know about the field concerned, an endorsement in isolation from the other referee(s) would not constitute grounds for publication. Answered by Editage Insights . 117. "Advice please! //--> Natureuses a transparent peer review system, where for manuscripts submitted from February 2020 we can publish the reviewer comments to the authors and author rebuttal letters of published original research articles. Many submissions are declined without being sent for review. The average number of days between the date of manuscript submission and date of receiving the editorial acceptance decision. Others must fail.. v. t. e. Sovereignty generally refers to the supreme authority of a state or territory. It means the editor has actually received it and is reviewing. HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. [CDATA[> Editors decisions are weighted according to the expertise of the referees, and not by a voting procedure. For our last submission the decision took 25 days for which the editor apologized. Graduated from ENSAT (national agronomic school of Toulouse) in plant sciences in 2018, I pursued a CIFRE doctorate under contract with SunAgri and INRAE in Avignon between 2019 and 2022. Most respectable journals have a definite map designed since submission, first editoroial decision, review time, last editorial decision, Editing and publication. Later in life this person's emotional feelings about the United States might be challenged if the person reads a critical history. Authors and their institutions are advised to coordinate any of their own publicity with the Journals and Editorial press office by e-mail after their paper is accepted for publication. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. A final decision of acceptance or rejection of the revised manuscript is made by the editors as soon as they conclude that they have sufficient information at hand for doing so. edit: so no. We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. Most papers are sent to two or three referees, but some are sent to more or, occasionally, just to one. Naturepapers are assigned to a print issue two weeks before publication, at which time authors will receive an e-mail notifying them of their scheduled print publication date. HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. What does the distribution of wait times for a editor decision look like for a manuscript submitted to Science or Nature? [2] In any state, sovereignty is assigned to the person, body, or institution that has the ultimate authority over other people in order to establish a law or change . Obviously, the most difficult situations are those in which the reviewers arrive at nearly or . How long do editor decisions take at Science/Nature? Directly from with editor, to decision under process. After review, Nature Communications rejected it because of reason X. Stage 2: Editor assigned. Got lab stories? Do roots of these polynomials approach the negative of the Euler-Mascheroni constant? ]]> var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. I am currently continuing at SunAgri as an R&D engineer. Wishing you the best of luck on your paper. [CDATA[> Nature is a British weekly scientific journal founded and based in London, England.As a multidisciplinary publication, Nature features peer-reviewed research from a variety of academic disciplines, mainly in science and technology. sinastria di coppia karmica calcolo; quincy homeless shelter; plastic bags for cleaning oven racks; claudia procula death; farm jobs in vermont with housing Is there a single-word adjective for "having exceptionally strong moral principles"? The reviewing process may normally take from 4 to 10 weeks, although during the pandemic longer times are common. Sometimes, the decision for the editor is really easy and quick and sometimes rather difficult and time-consuming. Rejections based on serious errors are frustrating for authors and damaging to the journal's credibility, and so we have a procedure for reconsidering decisions at the author's request. Nature Neuroscience What does Enterococcus faecalis look like. March 1, 2023 - As we approach, on March 14, its 12-year anniversary, now is as good a time as any to reflect on Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Rule 206 (4)-5 (the "Pay-to-Play Rule . ensure that the figures and tables are clear and will fit in the space available. Before publication, the Journals and Editorial press office also informs the press / public information officers of authors' institutions to allow them to prepare their own publicity. My paper has been in that state for over a month, but the editor let us know it was going out for peer review. Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. Is it fair to reject manuscript with few words of comments after long 9 months of review? Share. When facing rejection, many of us don't even know that there is a formal process of appealing the decision. 2. //-->